Secondly, because the analogy between Lightoom and Photoshop is very similar to how I feel about SongKong and Jaikoz. So why am I telling you this in the jthink blog ?įirstly, I have just launched my Secret Dorset Photography website, would be great if you come and took a look I still use Photoshop because it can do things that Lightroom cannot, but most of the time I just Lightroom. One particular aspect of Lightroom that I love is that instead of having to use layers to ensure I dont modify the original photo I do not even have to think about it, Lightroom never modifies the original photograph instead all changes are written to its catalog and can be undone.Īnd I never have to think about working colour profiles either, I only have to worry about colour profiles when I export the photograph for use in another application or print. But then as I delved into it I found almost everything I used Photoshop for could be done in Lightroom, and it was more obvious what to do and the results were often better. ![]() But then I discovered Adobe Lightroom - at first it replaced Aperture offering a much clearer way of managing my photographs and making simple adjustments such as contrast and exposure and white balance. I also used Apple Aperture for managing my photographs but found it awkward to use not least because of the opaque library it uses in a similar way to how iTunes manages songs. And because I did not use it regularly often I did not use it in the most efficient cleverest way. You can easily spend an afternoon working on a single photograph to get it perfect. ![]() ![]() It is an incredibly powerful tool for photo-editing that offers limitless opportunities, but that is part of its problem. I have used Adobe Photoshop on and off for many years for photo editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |